Score: 6

"Too short to do itself justice..."

submission: Random Nonsense

date: September 6, 2006

Had this been longer, with more content, it would have gotten a better score (assuming the quality stayed on par). It was random and somewhat funny, but it can't help but leave you with a desire for more random violence. Just didn't scratch that itch quite well enough. Ah well, keep up the good work.

Score: 8

"You are a deeply, deeply disturbed individual..."

submission: Joyful Adventures

date: September 6, 2006

There is no doubt in my mind that you have issues. However, all good artists have issues, and, in my experience, most of them are sadistic deviants. This flash was deeply disturbing, and intensely, randomly violent...I love it! The graphics were a little rough, and the sound could use a tad of work, but a solid 8/10 in my book. Good job, and keep up the good work.

Score: 9

"ROFLMAO!"

submission: The Adventures of Steve 2

date: September 5, 2006

This submission rocks! Funny as hell. I agree with the previous review that it was random, but not too much so. Anyway, awesome job, and keep up the next work. I think that this was even better than the first episode. Very little room for improvement. Maybe more violence? A well earned 9/10.

Score: 6

"wtf?"

submission: pelvic thrust

date: August 22, 2006

Strange and bizarre. I agree with earlier reviews that suggested buying a better microphone. The voice acting wasn't that bad, so I dunno why you said it was. Like the last guy said, the static is the killer. Anyway, the drawings were above average. In terms of humor/style it was random, but not ROFL random, and was a bit too short (messing up the comedic timing). 5/10 overall. Being a little less thrifty (with the mic) would have gotten you a 6.

Score: 2

"Lame..."

submission: [as] WTF?

date: August 21, 2006

Dude, I love Adult Swim, and am despondent that you would sully its good name. Frankly, this submission sucks. It wasn't funny, had numerous mispellings, the animation was poor, and basically the only thing it has going for it is the sound, which isn't all that great either. You need to try a lot harder. If you had just made the drawings a little better, you'd have gotten a little better of a score.

Score: 5

"actually, the song is called "Mope"..."

submission: Pac-man on Crack

date: August 21, 2006

First, the song by the Bloodhound Gang is called "Mope", not "Pacman on Crack". Second, this video does bare some blatant similarities to the video for "Mope", but I wouldn't say it was stolen. It borders on stolen though. In any case, the graphics were OK, sound was OK, style was OK, but all in all, I'd say the actual Bloodhound Gang video is much better, and funnier. All in all, I'd say this submission is average. Sorry.

Score: 7

"WTF!?!?!"

submission: Arfenhouse: The Movie

date: August 9, 2006

You would have gotten a solid 9/10 from me if the sound weren't so bad. The captions helped a lot, but how about writing them normally next time, or at least letting the viewer choose whether they want normal captions or 'puter-speak ones. The animation was a bit crude (except for Jo), but I'm assuming that's on purpose. Overall, very bizarre, very unique, pretty funny, and charmingly pointless. Probably the most unique movie I've seen in a while (one that doesn't completely blow anyway).

Score: 6

"a little better than average..."

submission: .:Super Mario Bros 3:.

date: August 9, 2006

You get props for drawing it all by hand instead of using sprites, but the animation was a bit rough, and the jokes were a bit cheesy, though I chuckled when Toad got jacked. In the vast sea of mario bros. based parodies here on Newgrounds, yours is a bit above average (~6.5/10). Pretty good for its length though, I guess.

Score: 9

"Great teaser!"

submission: Ray - Part 3 Introduction

date: August 9, 2006

This movie was great. It helped a lot with the character development of Ray. The storyline was excellent, especially the insight into Ray's personal life (his ex-wife and son). It was funny how his wife had a huge rack, and you could see her nips. I almost pissed myself laughing. Anyway, I'm really looking forward to the third installment of Ray. 60 minutes of gameplay is huge, and if the improvement in the third installment is the same as from the first to the second, Ray 3 is sure to get 10/10. Keep up the good work.

Score: 9

"One of the best submissions in a long time!"

submission: Ray - Part 1

date: August 9, 2006

Ultra violent, great graphics, and plenty of replay value. I don't know how long you worked on this, but its pretty sweet. Not enough people make interactive movies. The only way this would be better, is if the interactivity weren't limited to making decisions, but I guess then it would pretty much be just a game, which would be good too. The animation reminds me of South Park (I'm sure you've heard this a million times by now), but is really sharp despite its style not being completely unique. Great job. It would be hard to improve upon (though its possible).